From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  8 20:11:27 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 22BD816A4CE; Tue,  8 Jun 2004 20:11:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 621DE43D54; Tue,  8 Jun 2004 20:11:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i58KBP1W018568;
	Wed, 9 Jun 2004 00:11:25 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i58KBO12018567;
	Wed, 9 Jun 2004 00:11:24 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 00:11:24 +0400
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: Brian Feldman <green@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20040608201124.GA18439@nagual.pp.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>,
	Brian Feldman <green@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <200406081157.i58BvGJd012588@dungeon.home>
	<20040608122735.GA10813@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20040608153838.GF23083@green.homeunix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040608153838.GF23083@green.homeunix.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.25.0.61; VDF 6.25.0.87
	     (host: pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net>
Subject: Re: sshd should not use TCP_NODELAY
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 20:11:27 -0000

On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:38:38AM -0400, Brian Feldman wrote:
> be set on both ends.  I don't think TCP_NODELAY is really the problem,
> but I bet that without it there would be enough delay in-between various
> multi-character control sequences (arrow keys, etc.) that they'd
> become useless.

No. I use PuTTY client with TCP_NODELAY off and remote FreeBSD ncurses and
termcap-based apps which accepts escape sequences without any single
problem.

-- 
Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/