From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 14:37:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0988616A4CE; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:37:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail1.cableone.net [24.116.0.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBB643E8C; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:37:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail1.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 1352349 for multiple; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:35:09 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD8F0B0.20505@texoma.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:33:20 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <3FD7F786.7010208@texoma.net> <200312111330.08052.adridg@cs.kun.nl> <20031211154757.GC58813@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031211154757.GC58813@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: amd64 freebsd Subject: Re: Partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:37:49 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:30:08PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > >>On Thursday 11 December 2003 05:50, Jimmie Houchin wrote: >> >>>Do I really need a 4gb swap partition/slice? >>>I have 4gb ram. >> >>8 is suggested, no? Certainly if you've got a 220G drive, you can afford that? >>The story is sort of this: the VM is optimized for the situation that there's >>twice as much swap as memory. > > > I'm not aware that was ever the case, and if it was in 4.3BSD, I don't > think that is the case in 5-FreeBSD. Unless a vm hacker tells me > otherwise, I think 1.1 times RAM is a sufficient rule with one has 4-8GB > RAM and no other reason to believe on needs more swap. 1.1 times is the > space for crashdumps, and the need for that has already been told. Great! I am more than happy to pocket the extra 3.5gb. I don't think I will but, if I added more ram later... Can I have my 1.1*ram swap on multiple partitions? Thanks for this info. Jimmie