From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 20:07:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30012106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f176.google.com (mail-pz0-f176.google.com [209.85.222.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CAB8FC13 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so776711pzk.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:07:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=t2GGyx8d/GCYnJSvS/B+zDYrC9Pw2IAnTRWeOnv4O7M=; b=bIm9zlR1HEQ7P8WdltXlhowUO9GLRBNf/4G0499a1jsEPQUtQNEDkn/LQqV7nv6n0i 4IVHg8POwaKoiZPP5P9wl4RadTz4h2klx9NJpikz5LznP2UUcNuL4edeqn2D8hTzVdxI LPbIMIiXF8LHwUkqkXT4jf5grGAuXkpz/EhAY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Y+cmfVDTmHIRzYU35vFcDUbzs3C4fLfYUrQ6cElZJV4CbkCOunlI7XZ7CY150rPQG+ TfRz9pAOuSIFrfjqZd5Y7R206nySU64vBUd1hWJ51sP/QmAvzerqVoe6tLXI6vm2TNt0 ZuI4irWa0dzXiy1zs8XG3nTCocfnrOWJKiZm0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.5.39 with SMTP id 39mr1586483wfe.81.1264709266410; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:07:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:07:46 -0600 Message-ID: <6201873e1001281207o6071426ud29a9de5b02424e@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: James Smallacombe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:07:47 -0000 On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:59 PM, James Smallacombe wrote: > To follow up on this: Noticed the issue again this morning, which also was > accompanied by latency so high that I could not connect (some pings got > through at very high latency). I emailed the provider and they told me that > they had my port on their Ether switch set to 10Mbs. They switched it to > 100Mbs and only time will tell if that fixes it. > > Does this sound like it could be the entire cause? I ask because I've > maxed out pipes before, but never seen it shut all traffic down this much. > One key difference that I forgot to mention is that this server is running > TWO instances of named, on two different IPs (for different domains), each > running a few hundred zones. > > Bottom line: Would congestion cause this issue, or would this issue cause > congestion? > I would guess no, but that guess could easily be wrong. Have you tried turning up the logging to verbosity to get a better idea of what's happening? -- Adam Vande More