From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 09:10:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7411416A52D for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:10:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (joel.tallye.com [216.99.199.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5921643D5C for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:10:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lorenl@alzatex.com) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (hosea.tallye.com [127.0.0.1]) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9Q9AeuQ004053 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:10:41 -0700 Received: (from sttng359@localhost) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10/Submit) id i9Q9AZEF004050; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:10:35 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: hosea.tallye.com: sttng359 set sender to lorenl@alzatex.com using -f Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:10:35 -0700 From: "Loren M. Lang" To: sub01@freeode.co.uk Message-ID: <20041026091035.GG6513@alzatex.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1XWsVB21DFCvn2e8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C cc: pstal@it.teithe.gr cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: searching X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:10:44 -0000 --1XWsVB21DFCvn2e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 03:43:43PM +0100, John Murphy wrote: > P Stalidis wrote: > >hello, > >I'm trying to find one of the earliest versions of freeBSD... 1.0 would= =20 > >be fine! I'm trying to get an intel i386sx33 with only 1mb of ram, up=20 > >and running again... so any help is welcome > >thanks in advance :) >=20 > There's an ftp search engine at > http://www.freewareweb.com/ftpsearch.shtml > which shows some hits if you search for freebsd-1* >=20 > The oldest version with release notes on the FreeBSD web site is 1.1 > but it says "the 386sx is not recommended" so I wish you luck. >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/1.1/RELNOTES.FreeBSD I thought FreeBSD 1.x was illegal (or at least a bad idea) to use because of the tainted BSD Lite code. And also, I'm wondering how much bloat does 5.x add that can't be removed with a custom kernel. I know linux 2.6 has a specific section for removing extra features like the new I/O schedulers for embedded devices that couldn't really use it anyways. Is 1.x/2.x really better to use for old hardware? >=20 > --=20 > John. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 >=20 > !DSPAM:417bc0b7219791736320828! >=20 --=20 I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C =20 --1XWsVB21DFCvn2e8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBfhSL+vN6RuSjKAwRAollAJ9laeM7xzzTqBO8aNrHKb0+j5LzvQCeNIoI wNYpDTYTY2AtbkmQyxRKhBM= =jRJV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1XWsVB21DFCvn2e8--