Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:00:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: select.diff for review Message-ID: <200209231600.g8NG0Mod081956@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020923234523.A27512@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <20020922235943.G91924@espresso.q9media.com> <20020923234523.A27512@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:45:23 +1000, Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG> said: > I think it's probably better if you don't test whether select() has been > declared, and simply declare it anyway. If the two prototypes get out of > sync with each other, the compiler will warn, otherwise it's harmless. It's harmless except when GCC is compiling both definitions under -Werror -Wredundant-decls. See the implementation of WARNS in bsd.*.mk. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209231600.g8NG0Mod081956>