From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 00:29:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC5C23E for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 00:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f182.google.com (mail-ia0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1B78FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 00:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x2so10947369iad.13 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:29:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LxcU+AfCj4dMYaSipG3sDW8950J4WiBBTGrvI+Eq+7k=; b=E9THjOzeSkOX6mcDIqoj1LdGoh8InfKjpq3jaxdhf00moV/BD9zP2Sle5h0cyW+pmV zSHwtzBEpBKRewKwyxvKBQ0iB9dLrWNDl+Q+Ay7nGd2qU3UaIQQQtBqBiViAHb21qk9s NdEbcLP/FMS4LXqwYpbNY4AX5Cjrj9UQs37qPgJyNrXCCqjeA95RvPtrOEGkhXj3VWpL pbXuCQF9cKe54IH0qcaJIqLUrZkH38o8YA3ZzJKsIfOMu3Z5bI2ichxfZSZyMvafLpA9 W0gipEGDPykMVfexPupnk5AJkVWjgYsPO08rto3BpstbtXucadEMCrzBcBgJ1FqnZ0Nr 7DNg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.71.81 with SMTP id yj17mr22370976icb.0.1357000170680; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:29:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.65.132 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:29:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.65.132 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:29:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50E225DF.3090004@bsdforen.de> References: <50E225DF.3090004@bsdforen.de> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 00:29:30 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Post 9.1 stable file system problems From: Chris Rees To: Dominic Fandrey Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:29:37 -0000 On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" wrote: > > I have a Tinderbox that I just updated to the current RELENG_9. > Following the update build times for packages have increased by a > factor between 5 and 20. I.e. I have packages that used to build in > 5 minutes and now take an hour. > > I'm suspecting the file system ever since I saw that the majority of CPU > load was caused by ls when I looked at top (more than 2 minutes of CPU > time were counted that moment). The majority of the time most of the CPU > load is caused by bsdtar, pkg_add, qmake-qt4, etc. Without exception > tools that access a lot of files. > > The file system on which packages are built is nullfs mounted from > an async mounted UFS. I turned async off, to no avail. > > /usr/src/UPDATING says that there were nullfs optimisations. So I > think this is where the problem originates. I might hack the tinderbox to > use 'ln -s' or set it up for NFS to verify this. Is your kernel newer than the Jail? The converse causes problems. Chris