From owner-freebsd-security Tue Oct 31 16:54:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from homer.softweyr.com (mail.dobox.com [208.187.122.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB8637B479 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:54:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=softweyr.com ident=Fools trust ident!) by homer.softweyr.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13qmAi-0000Ds-00; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:54:32 -0700 Message-ID: <39FF69C8.4FAFF2AB@softweyr.com> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:54:32 -0700 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Alderud Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installer References: <001501c0433d$fb8f1c20$6400a8c0@XGod> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Andreas Alderud wrote: > > My only wish for FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE is that it will be as small as > possible, right now there are tons of stuff in 4.1 being installed that I > don't need. > For example, I don't see the reason why Sendmail is installed by default, > many people need it, most people don't, those who do would be better off it > was handled as a port. Some people would surtanly rather want PostFix being > installed. > I'm curious if I'm the only minimalist around here, personally I find it > much simpler to secure and administrate a box if it just includes only the > stuff that is absolutly needed. Standard FreeBSD Answer #1: we await your patches. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message