From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 19 19:15:01 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E778740C;
 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C606BF;
 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:15:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218])
 by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1JJEsrm008371;
 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:15:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240])
 by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1JJEkbQ050196;
 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:14:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org)
Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice?
From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>
In-Reply-To: <5123CA4C.90703@aldan.algebra.com>
References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com>
 <CADLo83-a7yqkFhgMinGiookjvgtFuTVeGQobOepuHDCeH_wsog@mail.gmail.com>
 <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com>
 <CADLo83-FoLrZGgkDZjjQ-jb-fcZNS3isn-F=zbd9pVkkmXQZUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com>
 <CAJ-Vmok2HFaU4QQHBEaO0iL3HE4pLpA=iFa-xfqQtOk9JewioQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com>
 <1361297952.1164.83.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
 <5123CA4C.90703@aldan.algebra.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:14:46 -0700
Message-ID: <1361301286.1164.93.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>, office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD <freebsd-office.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-office>,
 <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-office>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-office@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>,
 <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:15:02 -0000

On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 13:54 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
> > Licensing prevents us from updating gcc in the base.
> Licensing? Could you elaborate, which aspect of licensing you have in
> mind? 

Versions of gcc after the 4.2.1 version we use are licensed under GPLv3.
I'm not a lawyer, so I don't understand all the fine details of why
GPLv3 is bad for the freebsd project, but I accept the analysis and
decisions the project made on that subject some time ago.  

As you might imagine, switching to a new compiler isn't something you
decide to do this afternoon and finish up tomorrow with a big checkin.
It takes many months of testing and iteratively fixing bugs... bugs
found in the new compiler, and bugs the new compiler exposes in the
existing source base.

I think we've been able to cherry-pick a few specific fixes from gcc
upstream that weren't encumbered by GPLv3, but for the most part I think
nobody is actively maintaining the GPLv2 code anymore.

-- Ian