From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 17:10:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118E616A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:10:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cathy.bmts.com (cathy.bmts.com [216.183.128.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9559543D31 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:10:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rhempel@bmts.com) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (os-dsl-0616.bmts.com [216.183.154.105]) by cathy.bmts.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j32H88Ig025576; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 12:08:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <424ED258.4050005@bmts.com> Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:11:52 -0500 From: Ralph Hempel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Magda References: <20050402143558.11341.qmail@web54007.mail.yahoo.com> <424EB00F.4030804@bmts.com> <179b8b36d91607a80670f062c4c9ce73@ee.ryerson.ca> In-Reply-To: <179b8b36d91607a80670f062c4c9ce73@ee.ryerson.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Headless install with 5.X floppies not possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rhempel@bmts.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:10:57 -0000 David Magda wrote: > > On Apr 2, 2005, at 09:45, Ralph Hempel wrote: > >> I haven't tried it with 5.x, but here's how I modify the CD to >> allow headless installs for 4.x >> >> > bdgFreeBSDHeadless.html> > > > Wouldn't is be better to simply use the "-P" option instead of "-h"? > From boot(8) on my FreeBSD 4.x system: > > -P probe the keyboard. If no keyboard is found, the -D and -h > options are automatically set. > Are there any major issues with making this the default for x86 (and > amd64?) for future releases? Dave, great suggestion! I'm glad you took the time to read my little article and coment on it. It's things like this that keep the list interesting! Cheers, Ralph