From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jul 10  9:41:10 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 717F014C37; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 09:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 1130BN-000EaC-00; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 18:40:57 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: a BSD identd 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:50:01 -0400."
             <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907101146450.99611-100000@janus.syracuse.net> 
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 18:40:57 +0200
Message-ID: <56059.931624857@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:50:01 -0400, "Brian F. Feldman" wrote:

> I don't see a reason for pidentd when we could have an identd built in
> by me fixing inetd up, and it would all take up less space.

Hi Brian,

If you do end up messing with inetd's existing ident service, please
make sure that the default behaviour remains the same and that the
operator must do something to enable an ident service that reports more
than just "UNKNOWN-ERROR".

Thanks,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message