From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 18 02:12:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA23749 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 18 Mar 1998 02:12:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nomad.mt.sri.com (ppp58-max01.twics.com [202.237.149.185]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA23586 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 1998 02:11:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@nomad.mt.sri.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA00841; Wed, 18 Mar 1998 03:11:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 03:11:44 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199803181011.DAA00841@nomad.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Mark Newton , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSDI executables In-Reply-To: <4047.890178584@time.cdrom.com> References: <199803172330.KAA26028@frenzy.ct> <4047.890178584@time.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: "Nate Williams" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I've told a colleague that the -Q option to ld still works under 2.2.5, > > and will generate an executable which stands a better-than-even chance > > of running under BSD/OS 2.0 from BSDI. > > I don't believe that BSD/OS 2.0 is capable of running any sort of > FreeBSD binaries now, linked with -Q or otherwise. Actually, if you put all the FreeBSD shlibs onto a recent BSDi box, it will run non-kernel binaries fine. Some things don't work (JDK didn't work, but tcsh, kaffe, and ssh worked fine). Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message