From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 9 02:46:34 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA25314 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 02:46:34 -0700 Received: from mail.rwth-aachen.de (mail.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.144.9]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA25308 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 02:46:31 -0700 Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de by mail.rwth-aachen.de (PMDF V4.3-10 #7297) id <01HSNYJ1QCTC00343Q@mail.rwth-aachen.de>; Sun, 09 Jul 1995 11:46:51 +0100 Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.8/8.6.9) id LAA00724 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 11:59:45 +0200 Date: Sun, 09 Jul 1995 11:59:45 +0200 From: "Christoph P. Kukulies" Subject: pcvt Doc/INSTALL.FreeBSD-2.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Message-id: <199507090959.LAA00724@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The suggested patch in pcvt Doc/INSTALL.FreeBSD-2.0 seems to be superfluous in -current since it seems to be already there. What is the options line for PCVT_FREEBSD=? I see conditional code testing for PCVT_FREEBSD > 205 in the source, so should I use 210 as a value? --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de FreeBSD blues.physik.rwth-aachen.de 2.0-BUILT-19950701 FreeBSD 2.0-BUILT-