Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:59:18 +0200 From: "Roderick van Domburg" <r.s.a.vandomburg@student.utwente.nl> To: <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org> Subject: FW: ISC dhcp server on NetBSD Message-ID: <200404262159.i3QLxG814493@netlx014.civ.utwente.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Just so that you know. > -----Original Message----- > From: dhcp-hackers-bounce@isc.org [mailto:dhcp-hackers-bounce@isc.org] On > Behalf Of David W. Hankins > Sent: maandag 26 april 2004 18:21 > To: dhcp-hackers@isc.org > Subject: Re: ISC dhcp server on NetBSD > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Roderick van Domburg wrote: > > For completeness: on some FreeBSD targets (sparc64), time_t already is > > 64-bit. dhclient fails horribly on these targets, and it's safe to > assume > > that dhcpd will too. > really? > > $ uname -srp > FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p4 amd64 > > dhclient works fine for me. sizeof(time_t) == 8. nary a glitch. > admittedly, i haven't tried dhcpd, except to check syntaxes on > test configs. > > furthermore, i hear nothing but minor glitches (none in rc13) from > people who have chosen the relatively harder path of running isc > dhcpd and/or dhclient on sparc64 systems running solaris. > > > i must conclude then that if there is some problem with 3.0.1rc13 > freebsd-sparc64 dhclient, it is with freebsd-sparc64 specifically. > > -- > David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time, > Operations Engineer you'll just have to do it again." > Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins > > -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFAjTcHcXeLeWu2vmoRAuBpAJ9TzJPGjF23FXmQbb2wQ0S+fDxbuwCePVnD > 6BBt7xZ9cYwus72kYs4TDWY= > =cDn6 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404262159.i3QLxG814493>