Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 03:19:23 -0700 From: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2) Message-ID: <5454B3AB.8040607@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <5454A5C9.2050003@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20141031185621.GC15967@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5454A5C9.2050003@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/1/2014 2:20 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > However, I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense > to create one file which includes all of the other bits of port > infrastructure. This should be a text format that people can read > easily and manipulate with a text editor or standard unix tools. > Something like UCL might be a good choice. That sounds dangerously close to reinventing SRPM.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5454B3AB.8040607>