From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 16 12:07:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id E1BFACB1; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:07:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:07:05 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r361646 - in head/net/samba36: . files
Message-ID: <20140716120705.GA14729@FreeBSD.org>
References: <CALdFvJEvf4-RSJNUVxX08T8K-tq9PoKge-XxmhDafAn_QxjEcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <53C451FA.2020304@marino.st> <20140715170501.GA73101@FreeBSD.org>
 <53C5618F.2020104@FreeBSD.org> <20140716094453.GA53961@FreeBSD.org>
 <53C65677.8060603@FreeBSD.org> <20140716111328.GB82901@FreeBSD.org>
 <53C6638E.6000801@FreeBSD.org> <20140716115304.GA5861@FreeBSD.org>
 <53C668C9.9030209@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53C668C9.9030209@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>,
 "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@FreeBSD.org>, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>,
 svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, marino@freebsd.org,
 "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:07:06 -0000

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:58:01PM +0100, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
> Again, I have no objections about licenses/comments/whatever. I want
> actually merely to figure out, which manifest's fields are
> *significant*. At this point, I can easily change this list without
> insulting users. On the contrary, after 1.3 release that would be hard.

Understood; sounds certainly reasonable.

> I suggest thus to stop bikescheding and switch to constructive
> discussion and define how should we distinguish one package from
> another. And no, we *cannot* rely on port version/revision/epoch only!

One thing that comes to mind is svn info /usr/ports/foo/bar | grep Last
Changed Rev.  Then port (portupgrade) users won't get upset by countless
portrevs, and pkg will be able to rebuild (redistribute) a package even
if maintainer forgot to bump portrev (esp. for an important update).

./danfe