Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:37:56 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205852] Be nicer about multiple sqlalchemy ports Message-ID: <bug-205852-13-vSswfM3oY5@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205852-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205852-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205852 --- Comment #16 from Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Palle Girgensohn from comment #15) > OK. I would prefer we just had one sqlalchemy port, and bend the other > ports to work with the new fresh version only. I very strongly prefer that too, but it just is not always achievable -- to= day or in the future there may be a need to retain multiple versions of a port = in the tree because the latest version breaks compatibility for some of the consumers. Such a situation should not cause more damage than necessary, however, and a port that could use multiple versions of a dependency needs to be able to s= ay so -- instead of insisting on only one of the alternatives. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205852-13-vSswfM3oY5>