From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 12 12:26:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7F6106564A; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:26:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342258FC19; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD55446B06; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B3F48A02E; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:26:37 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Andriy Gapon Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:26:36 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110617; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4E6DB696.1080608@FreeBSD.org> <201109120743.02181.jhb@freebsd.org> <4E6DF4D6.8050501@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E6DF4D6.8050501@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109120826.36804.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:26:38 -0000 On Monday, September 12, 2011 8:02:30 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > > I think the patch is > > fine, and I'd even prefer to go ahead and drop the extra cruft (like removing > > nops and aligns as well as -mrtd and -mregparm) from the UFS boot2 as well. > > I personally agree, thank you for this suggestion. > My current plan is to leave boot2 alone until stable/9 is branched, but to try to > get zfs/gpt boot changes into 9.0. What do you think? I think this is fine. -- John Baldwin