Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:36:59 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: switching threading libraries
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604071434070.20876@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <4436ACA3.3000507@elischer.org>
References:  <slrne3ck4t.18h.csaba@beastie.creo.hu> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0604070910310.15406-100000@sea.ntplx.net> <20060407140809.GZ1323@beastie.creo.hu> <4436ACA3.3000507@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Julian Elischer wrote:

> Csaba Henk wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:10:56AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>> 
>>> Only between libthr and libpthread.  libc_r doesn't have symbol
>>> versioning.
>>> 
>> 
>> That's sad -- given, as noted elsewhere, libc_r is the best suitable
>> for tracing.
>> 
>> Will it remain like this or can we expect a symver'd libc_r
>> in due time?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Csaba
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>> 
> Dan, maybe we can make an option where libc_r degrades down to one kse 
> somehow
> then it would probable be more traceable.

You mean like:

   $ sudo sysctl kern.threads.virtual_cpu=1

and, or

   $ LIBPTHREAD_PROCESS_SCOPE=yes; export LIBPTHREAD_PROCESS_SCOPE

??

-- 
DE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0604071434070.20876>