From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 14:49:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2A316A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:49:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5271D43D1D for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:49:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2UEn1aa061917 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:49:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id j2UEn1v5061914; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:49:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:49:01 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200503301449.j2UEn1v5061914@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Stephen McKay In-Reply-To: <200503301139.j2UBdMp5016442@dungeon.home> References: <20050327223238.GA749@polands.org> <010401c53385$584a04c0$6800000a@venti> <20050329041527.GA9586@VARK.MIT.EDU> <20050329062550.GA69824@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <200503301139.j2UBdMp5016442@dungeon.home> X-Spam-Score: -9.9 () IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:40:39 +0000 cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Heads up: gtar gone from base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:49:03 -0000 < said: > Tar is indeed a most excellent program for copying directory trees, since > even in this modern century cp fails to correctly handle hard links. Sigh. I believe the record will show that `cp' handles hard links correctly according to the specification; that's simply not the behavior you want. (In POSIX one would use `pax -rw' for that.) -GAWollman