Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 08:54:58 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: john <john@unt.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel Pro/100+ Message-ID: <199807061554.IAA03498@antipodes.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Jul 1998 07:39:44 CDT." <199807061239.HAA27576@leonardo.cascss.unt.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I'd say Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100B without the blink of an eye. I > > don't use it in 100MB mode (yet), but in 10MB it outperforms anything I > > Speaking of this, is there work in progress for support of the new Intel > card that replaces the 10/100B--the Pro 100+? Intels page says that the > new card is driver compatible--anyone using the new card? Why would there need to be any work in progress at all, if they're driver-compatible? And for that matter, why would I be recommending the 100+ if we didn't already support it? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199807061554.IAA03498>