From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 08:49:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28212AB5; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66E1BCD; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XZyYB-000L3p-NR; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 12:49:19 +0400 Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:49:19 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: Removing disconnected tty drivers Message-ID: <20141003084919.GA79756@zxy.spb.ru> References: <1789815.bS8Ac2qsJ6@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20141001100353.GF20707@server.rulingia.com> <201410021119.37723.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201410021119.37723.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:49:25 -0000 On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:19:37AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 6:03:53 am Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On 2014-Sep-29 11:53:53 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > >The following drivers have never been converted to use the new tty layer > > >introduced in 8.0 and have been disconnected since then. Several of them are > > >for older multiport serial cards, and in the case of sio(4), current kernels > > >use uart(4) instead. Barring major objections, I plan to remove them from the > > >tree later this week. If someone wishes to update them, they can always be > > >pulled back from svn history. > > > > > >dev/digi/digi.c: tp = port->tp = ttyalloc(); > > > > See > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152253 > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158086 > > unfortunately, I no longer have access to the hardware. I'm happy to > > update the patches to compile on -current but can't do more than that. > > The second one was tested by another submitter, so if you want to spend the > time, please update them and see if you can get someone to test them. To be > honest, I would be happy to drop ISA support and just keep PCI support if > that is simpler. Most difference between ISA/EISA and PCI at initialise time (and most difference between models, not buses). After initialization all code is common.