From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 16 22:10:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F97C1065671 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC028FC0A for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6GMA3Qf090762 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:10:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m6GMA3e9090761; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:10:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:10:03 GMT Message-Id: <200807162210.m6GMA3e9090761@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kris Kennaway Cc: Subject: Re: misc/125680: atacontrol depends on executable in /usr X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kris Kennaway List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:10:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/125680; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kris Kennaway To: David Schultz Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/125680: atacontrol depends on executable in /usr Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:04:28 +0200 David Schultz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Better fix: use /bin/csh and the built-in nice. > > Better yet, given that it's a C program that invokes > /usr/bin/nice -n 20 /bin/dd if=/dev/ar%d of=/dev/null bs=1m & > via system(3), would be to use nice(3). Actually, the whole thing > is sort of dubious: What if my libraries are corrupted and I'm trying > to use /rescue/atacontrol to fix things, but it gives an error because > it's hardwired to use /bin/dd instead of /rescue/dd? A simple > while (!eof) read(); loop should suffice. > > You make a good point, sir :) Kris