From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Oct 18 4:49:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6D637B401 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 04:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 15uBgI-0007QX-00; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:49:46 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: Yarema , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Apache port change from nobody:nogroup to www:www planned In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:43:06 +0400." <20011018154306.C63215@nagual.pp.ru> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:49:46 +0200 Message-ID: <28552.1003405786@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:43:06 +0400, "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote: > > Apache is not abusing nobody:nogroup -- users who don't configure their CGI > > environment are. The Right Thing is to run CGIs via suexec. > > No, Apache abuses nobody just running under it. It gains to it access > priveledges it must not have. Now you've TOTALLY lost me. You're saying processes shouldn't be run as nobody? :-) > > suexec works better if apache does run as nobody:nogroup. > > No. suexec works equally for any user/group. Exactly. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message