Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:46:41 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 187136] [NEW PORT] irc/irccd: Fast and powerful C++ IRC bot
Message-ID:  <bug-187136-13-P0xto35d1l@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-187136-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-187136-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187136

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |andreast@FreeBSD.org
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
                   |                            |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1935
                   |                            |28

--- Comment #7 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> ---
As for C++14 (or C++11) support, this requires some more work both on
the FreeBSD side and GCC, as Andreas Tobler who kindly is looking into
this has found.

As Andreas wrote in PR:

  "Given the results of my studies it needs some work. On both sides,
  the gcc part needs to be improved regarding detection of functionality 
  and on the FreeBSD part we're still lacking some complex functions
  in libm."

Now I am wondering, Andreas: would it make sense to fake/force C++14
mode for GCC on FreeBSD, even when some fringe functionality may not
be working yet?  I guess what 99% of apps and users need, should be
there today.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-187136-13-P0xto35d1l>