From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 11 15:39:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946241512A for ; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 15:39:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA13443; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 16:39:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA36934; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 16:37:32 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199907112237.QAA36934@harmony.village.org> To: John Polstra Subject: Re: a BSD identd Cc: Doug , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jul 1999 13:19:18 PDT." References: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 16:37:32 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message John Polstra writes: : Really?? Even though their connect() call failed? Ick! I know : sendmail doesn't behave that way. I'll take your word about the IRC : daemons -- I don't know anything about them. Yes. At least that's what I've observed. However, I believe the culprit was a firewall that just dropped the packets for the connection request, so it had to wait 30 seconds to timeout. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message