Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:40:43 -0400 From: "Thomas Mueller" <mueller23@insightbb.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Available... Message-ID: <91.33.04060.B7188305@smtp01.insight.synacor.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
from Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>: > As a data point.. if you're talking about "stable/9", then that is > still available via cvs/csup/cvsup as RELENG_9. > If you track 9-stable, you're unaffected. > I got two private emails about this. > To be clear, yes, if you're tracking RELENG_9, you will get > "9.1-STABLE", and future 9.2 things just like before. > All that is missing is the release management branch. > But there will never be a RELENG_10* anything in cvs. from Ken Menzel <kenfreebsd@icarz.com>: > As I see no answered your real question. But I agree with them: yes you > can still use csup or cvsup for releng_9 (stable 9). > But as to your question, if you are switching to svn to try it out: In > my experience I had to remove (rm -rf /usr/src) /usr/src or the old > files remained. The checkout process did not update the existing files. > But maybe I did something wrong. > Tools other than cvs and cvsup are unaffected. You can still use > portsnap or make fetch in /usr/ports etc. > Ken This should help get me started. I could even attempt to cover both bases with cd /usr mv src src-csup mkdir src and be ready to go with svn. But since I could run csup again if needed/desired, this might be overkill, unless I want to compare the file formats. It looks like it would be easier to keep track of revision number with svn than with csup. If svn is going to be the main tool for keeping up to date with source, then subversion ought to become part of the base system. I might some day want to try 10-current (HEAD) on a different partition, then csup will not work at all to get the source. Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?91.33.04060.B7188305>