From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Wed Nov 21 16:58:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D33D113E42D; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11F166A641; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-lj1-f169.google.com (mail-lj1-f169.google.com [209.85.208.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kevans) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A65C124290; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-lj1-f169.google.com with SMTP id e5-v6so5467273lja.4; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 08:58:20 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZP0K8O929WQ48IItOSmdwtjRvPPBCwSv6OyiTTfLg7i14C8QYP iX2ji4CspK5Pf+tZWBzqFCOgtN3qGtG855/nnuU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XfnfsocKSirr/yXuPP7BqXYoIJnZVTEqs7JOpGVyKbQHuCOvWyu1lpfOFins/tCO+KL9Ak96qVrmDpCAG+pSQ= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2019:: with SMTP id g25-v6mr4403380ljg.20.1542819499129; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 08:58:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201811211654.wALGsAPT072769@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <201811211654.wALGsAPT072769@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> From: Kyle Evans Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:58:06 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r340722 - head/lib/libbe To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: 0mp@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 11F166A641 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.37 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.34)[0.342,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:96.47.64.0/20, country:US]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.06)[0.064,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.04)[-0.041,0] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:58:21 -0000 On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:54 AM Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:19 AM Rodney W. Grimes > > wrote: > > > > > > > Author: 0mp (ports committer) > > > > Date: Wed Nov 21 11:22:44 2018 > > > > New Revision: 340722 > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/340722 > > > > > > > > Log: > > > > libbe(3): Put each error value in separate line. > > > > > > > > As requested by a TODO in the source code. > > > > > > > > Reviewed by: bcr > > > > Approved by: krion (mentor, implicit), mat (mentor, implicit) > > > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18063 > > > > > > Who with a src bit approved the commit to src? > > > > > > > I do want to clarify- bcr approved it in the review (explicitly with > > "... hereby approved!") -- are you mainly pointing out that he failed > > to annotate this properly in the commit, or is doc bit approval for a > > commit to a manpage in src insufficient? > > That is defanitly a bit of a grey area, from reading and re-reading > the commit bit page it is clear that a doc committer can commit > to src documentation, it is not clear if they can approve a commit > by someone else to the src tree, it does say > ""Approved by" from a non-mentored committer > with the appropriate bit" > > It probably would be fine to have said Approved by: bcr. > Agreed- I think this is fine given that it's within the scope of bcr's doc bit. > I still question what a out of scope commit that is > approved by: (mentor, implicit). I am not even sure > what that means in this context. Have his mentors > said he can commit anything anyplace without them > seeing it? If so then release the mentor/mentee bit > would be more appropriate? > I suspect it's that they're not interested in any doc changes he has, because they're not doc people. Well, mat@ is, but mat isn't mentoring him for docs, he's mentoring him for ports. Such approvals would just be rubber stamps anyways, because they as mentors might not necessarily be up-to-date on doc protocols.