From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Mon May 13 05:48:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9944B15ACAFB; Mon, 13 May 2019 05:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E60C69B2A; Mon, 13 May 2019 05:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 12B821625D; Mon, 13 May 2019 05:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 05:48:54 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Adam Weinberger Cc: Max Brazhnikov , Antoine Brodin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r501300 - in head: math math/curv misc misc/openvdb Message-ID: <20190513054853.GA49501@FreeBSD.org> References: <201905112022.x4BKM9n6069421@repo.freebsd.org> <1562227.MsCH1bHPGx@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3E60C69B2A X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.970,0] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 05:48:54 -0000 On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 02:27:09PM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:37 PM Max Brazhnikov wrote: > > On Sat, 11 May 2019 20:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Antoine Brodin wrote: > > > Author: antoine > > > Date: Sat May 11 20:22:09 2019 > > > New Revision: 501300 > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/501300 > > > > > > Log: > > > Remove untested ports > > > > You could have marked them BROKEN instead. > > BROKEN is for ports that used to work and now there's a problem. It > lets end-users keep what they have instead of accidentally building > something known not to work anymore. > > When a port is broken from the start, there's no point in it being in > the tree. It can be re-added if/when it works. The thing is that readding them properly takes extra work and sometimes people might forget to do a repocopy. It would be more appropriate to disconnect them from the build and give original committer couple of days to react, not silently removing them without even providing a log which shows the failure. I totally understand Yuri's frustration here. ./danfe