From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Nov 7 16:04:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D096E5C958; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 16:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peixotocassiano@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF999722FB; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 16:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peixotocassiano@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x195so10257959qkb.12; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 08:04:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mpSZgR/BlqIslQ7DXUyswSNMDZVgaWhzmX6xUwUUXdo=; b=Ik3HNNAUHaCD+xolpN9lSrycOQTEwFRJP7o4ZSov7hozYPoGpYt7xg83k8UBbds5Lc 1MuLRQsGVqRWSWHvxWWwyleRGGv2gsLDkg8K+qJ9b0ZG+tupzbhQa9xXWyGYNp9En4k2 N34Fxy4+EKAApKr6oq28Uv7rngAr04JvtX/BqcwKAnvUZeRLgmQGwmohV+L9EkcGBaG6 wQiooCZk9aqkiegQE5DydLtFovQqeYGcV7aK0eoL6vypatB3s8ijDcoVRywLG8LoHBRR RIspfABuNWHUlhc1VYukTfw562f3AA9IqcTxIJAxkrG3kkCOFrrK2tkdNqTMZOHvel6Y 1g/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mpSZgR/BlqIslQ7DXUyswSNMDZVgaWhzmX6xUwUUXdo=; b=SvuRwMcmHC55Mx0/RVV0W5YLWs/qFIY18qdo7Z7Dn2YHYoyC4p5PcHoiHXf3djsCw6 AG0FwGO/Cnx2qHf3tSTg162j+CyBkmDMovCSjGkHVLIuVpG4YGm8XkGbj1MJRMiam/Ww 4srz5S1sLv4zH3ISmc6sTfSY4rkhCzRas8hlUkCNU+QnTQO533s9xV+RrlCFzcvZdU9X 7XYnhEXrKOaRvm/aevbjoGThFHzwgR0WyGWpXX4Bx8LkMROviIcWs3bBOyilHVY29Sx5 VstSvKk0axRuDwmhfhJzTtmQIjJGM17J71om3DPskGHyT/m+/mAaTLzZ2j2vpGiwr3Sr yciw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7RfypjKXlzuyv/k9DB/638a2HP9WWfOBh7oCw0yGhl6mAqdhBg OZ2OKLjXhT3qtvF2qHtw+dmxTSu99qsGH6onF7k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+R1LNdCXWfJCZm/sIYfg84q5/RXZK9QGCMwuZJqGN4oo5ApqL6uUDMi0Jv8TSavOczwPPzvhzuF84UfNaBsBLA= X-Received: by 10.55.134.1 with SMTP id i1mr26628388qkd.195.1510070688804; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 08:04:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.53.23 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 08:04:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4c16c960-3b4a-75ab-41ed-51c8109b940a@FreeBSD.org> <20170830124855.ph5cca5pwjd2pphf@ivaldir.net> <20170830125950.mcp34sddcp6c757t@ivaldir.net> <20170830143426.r53pztrybmmvfy6c@ivaldir.net> From: Cassiano Peixoto Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:04:48 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg issue after FreeBSD 11 upgrade To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: Matthew Seaman , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 16:04:50 -0000 Hi Baptiste, Sorry to bother you. Did you have some time to work on this thread? Thanks. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Cassiano Peixoto < peixotocassiano@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for your support Baptiste, I really appreciate that. > > As same as HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS option the new one should be handled > carefully. > > Please keep us posted when it's ready. > > > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017, Baptiste Daroussin > wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:07:51AM -0300, Cassiano Peixoto wrote: >> > Ok I know about HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS, it's a good approach. But how to deal >> > with when I need to restart a service without upgrading? Reaper >> > functionnality is a trouble for many administrators who made meta ports >> to >> > manage their servers. I really think it could be a option to be >> > enabled/disabled. Can you see this possibility? >> > >> >> Yes I could add an option to disable the reaper functionnality (and will >> probably to unblock such use case as soon as I have time to do it.) >> >> However I still think this is not the right idea :) and a better one >> could be >> found >> >> Bapt >> >