From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 29 14:31:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EBF1065678 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ipfw@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4758FC15 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:31:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ipfw@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JV6H2-0000q1-NG for freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:31:44 +0000 Received: from 195.208.174.178 ([195.208.174.178]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:31:44 +0000 Received: from vadim_nuclight by 195.208.174.178 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:31:44 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org From: Vadim Goncharov Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Nuclear Lightning @ Tomsk, TPU AVTF Hostel Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <20080228151134.GA73358@tin.it> <47C7B913.5000405@elischer.org> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.208.174.178 X-Comment-To: Julian Elischer User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: [patch] ipfw_nat as a kld module X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:31:50 -0000 Hi Julian Elischer! On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:49:39 -0800; Julian Elischer wrote about 'Re: [patch] ipfw_nat as a kld module': >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~piso/ipfw_nat_module.patch >>> Any objection if i commit it? >> >> Some comments: >> >> * //comments are not in out style(9) > in case this is cryptic to you.. > do > "man 9 style" Of course I did before. It doesn't permit ``//''-style comments, all examples are given in (C, not C++) style of /* ... */. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]