From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Aug 7 07:04:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2355BAFF48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 07:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@mail.sermon-archive.info) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5A61CFA for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 07:04:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@mail.sermon-archive.info) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (unknown [71.177.216.148]) by zoom.lafn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2397D34A885; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 00:04:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0 From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <20160807063745.GV96200@home.opsec.eu> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 00:04:23 -0700 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <24B2AEE6-5127-4969-9261-E5AD7E35C195@mail.sermon-archive.info> References: <6CD628FE-DF3B-4AC7-8214-6E6382F6AAA7@mail.sermon-archive.info> <20160807063745.GV96200@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 07:04:26 -0000 > On 6 August 2016, at 23:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 > Hi! >=20 >> Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might >> be corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0? >=20 > Does >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211354 >=20 > help ? >=20 >> I have a number of production systems on 9.3 that need to be >> upgraded. I can't go to 10.x as it won't boot on that hardware. >> However, 11.0 does boot. I can't afford the downtime to completely >> rebuild them. >=20 > Uh, that sounds complicated. No that didn't fix it. That change was in the EN which was applied and = while the line numbers are different in 9.3, the extra character is in = my copy.