From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 13 11:36:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAFA16A4CE for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 11:36:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from geri.cc.fer.hr (geri.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E3A43D78 for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 11:36:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from geri.cc.fer.hr (localhost.cc.fer.hr [127.0.0.1]) by geri.cc.fer.hr (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4DBaZjB005976 for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:36:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from localhost (ivoras@localhost) by geri.cc.fer.hr (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id j4DBaZgG005973 for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:36:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) X-Authentication-Warning: geri.cc.fer.hr: ivoras owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 13:36:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Ivan Voras Sender: ivoras@geri.cc.fer.hr To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050513133601.T5970@geri.cc.fer.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: nForce[34] chipsets? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:36:41 -0000 Some time ago, there were complaints that nForce chipsets don't work very well on FreeBSD - specifically various components like built-in NIC, sound card, ACPI... Is this still true? What about nForce4 (PCI-Express) support? (I'm interested in 5.x branch only) -- Every sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology - Arthur C Anticlarke