From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 16:21:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 134A3F54; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 16:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask.apl.washington.edu", Issuer "troutmask.apl.washington.edu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8CBB20AE; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 16:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s72GLMEA032544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Aug 2014 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s72GLMmJ032543; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 09:21:22 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: William Grzybowski Subject: Re: math/lapack broken Message-ID: <20140802162122.GA32459@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20140802004717.GA29541@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20140802045438.GA30183@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 16:21:24 -0000 On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:49:03PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:14:43PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > >> I can't help but notice how unrespectful you have been. > >> Its not the first message ranting about something broken. > >> > > > > I can't help but notice how poorly some decisions are made > > within the ports community, and no, this isn't the nearly > > the first poor decision. > > > > If the port has an option to build the profiled libraries > > and that option is selected, then I expect the port to > > build the profiled library. > > You're welcome to help the ports committers to maintain over 20k ports > and raise the quality. > Are you looking for mentors for your ports@ commit bit? > Check your history. I was a port maintainer many years ago. Dropped maintainership of all my ports after several unreviewed changes by others to those ports were made. These unreviewed changes broke those ports and I was forced to clean up the mess. This of course has little to do with the issue that I have raised here. A port, namely math/lapack, has an option to build profiled libraries and the port does not honor that option when selected. It's simple Q&A. Either remove the option or fix it. -- Steve