Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:59:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Paolo Pisati <flag@libero.it> Cc: FreeBSD_Net <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Differences between netgraph nodes in 4.x and 5.x Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307290957410.8223-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20030729161225.GA231@newluxor.skynet.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote: > > > > well, i answer to myself: > > > > it seems it's not my mistake, cause you can trigger it with a > > plain original tee node too. =P > > Ok, i promise this is the last msg: > > it was my mistake, whe i deleted the tee node, the ether > node short circuited the lower & upper hook, and then > it was impossibile to connect again something to the ether > hook. > > solution: rmhook one of the ether hook, and connect > again mynode... =P > > maybe it would be nice to change the error msg from: > "File exists" to "hook already connected" or something like this The fix in this case would be for the ether node to not allow this ti happen.. this requires a few small changes.. The error codes must exist in sys/errno.h I try select one that is closest in spirit :-) > > bye > > -- > > Paolo > > GUFI: http://www.gufi.org > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0307290957410.8223-100000>