From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 07:32:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DFA106567D; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe03.swip.net [212.247.154.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F028FC28; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:32:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=nXlDabneoW0A:10 a=uEzv4HemXiYA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=M8b_wTzEtboA:10 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:17 a=mSBxGRa38I5jodgpOH8A:9 a=I6Cbr6VEyAYYEzE6qtglDhQepVEA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Received: from [188.126.201.140] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe03.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 1418686487; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:32:21 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: Andriy Gapon Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:29:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201006230238.06831.hselasky@c2i.net> <4C21B170.2030903@icyb.net.ua> <4C21B383.2000602@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4C21B383.2000602@icyb.net.ua> X-Face: +~\`s("[*|O,="7?X@L.elg*F"OA\I/3%^p8g?ab%RN'(; _IjlA: hGE..Ew, XAQ*o#\/M~SC=S1-f9{EzRfT'|Hhll5Q]ha5Bt-s|oTlKMusi:1e[wJl}kd}GR Z0adGx-x_0zGbZj'e(Y[(UNle~)8CQWXW@:DX+9)_YlB[tIccCPN$7/L' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006230929.30410.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Kernel modules don't work properly in FreeBSD 8.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:32:24 -0000 On Wednesday 23 June 2010 09:10:59 Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/06/2010 10:02 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > I don't dispute that it is found broken in particular environments, I > > just think that the analysis could be incorrect. Ok. > > Which also brings the question - what arch(s) is affected? > I tested on amd64. > I tested on i386. --HPS