From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 23 20:44:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 175D9A90 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4BE9E1A for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C08B2B9A8; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:44:04 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Rick Macklem Subject: Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:33:41 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <691948956.6194558.1414090646089.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <691948956.6194558.1414090646089.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201410231633.41971.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:44:04 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:44:06 -0000 On Thursday, October 23, 2014 2:57:26 pm Rick Macklem wrote: > Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should > bring it up. > > 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved > problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding > issues in the new nfs that don't exist in the oldnfs.) > 2 - Does anyone see a problem with getting rid of oldnfs for > FreebSD-11? > 3 - If I get rid of it in -head, I can do it either in mid-December > or mid-April. (I can't do commits during the winter.) > Does anyone have a rough idea when the 11.0 release cycle will > start, so I can choose which of the above would be preferable? > (I figured I'd wait until after the last 10.n release that happens > before 11.0, since it will be easier to MFC before the removal of > oldnfs.) > > Thanks in advance for any comments, rick > ps: John, I've cc'd you since I thought you are the guy most likely to > need to do commits/MFCs to oldnfs. I think it is fine to remove it from 11. I would do it sooner rather than later. -- John Baldwin