From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jul 23 05:35:15 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id FAA00337
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 05:35:15 -0700
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA00323
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 05:35:12 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id NAA01076
	  ; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 13:34:37 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: palmer.demon.co.uk: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: Imperial Irrigation District <iidpwr@lightlink.satcom.net>
cc: gurney_j@efn.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What people are doing with FBSD 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Jul 1995 00:47:30 PDT."
             <199507230747.AAA16481@lightlink.satcom.net> 
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 1995 13:34:36 +0100
Message-ID: <1074.806502876@palmer.demon.co.uk>
From: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199507230747.AAA16481@lightlink.satcom.net>, Imperial Irrigation Di
strict writes:
>I experienced the same problem. My FreeBSD 2.0 couldn't start pcnfsd by inetd.
>Anybody know why?

When I started running FreeBSD 2.0, I installed pcnfsd in inetd
without troubles... Admitedly my machine always has been and always
will be a rather mutant combination of some up-to-date bits and some
2.0-R bits, but there you go :-)

Gary