From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 11:45:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B4B62E for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:45:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mohacsi@niif.hu) Received: from strudel.ki.iif.hu (strudel.ki.iif.hu [IPv6:2001:738:0:411:20f:1fff:fe6e:ec1e]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221DC8FC08 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cirkusz.lvs.iif.hu (cirkusz.lvs.iif.hu [193.225.14.182]) by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C85B3D9; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:45:34 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cirkusz.lvs.iif.hu Received: from strudel.ki.iif.hu ([IPv6:::ffff:193.6.222.244]) by cirkusz.lvs.iif.hu (cirkusz.lvs.iif.hu [::ffff:193.225.14.72]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BkOJbN6WeEw1; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:45:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix, from userid 9002) id 2819E3F4; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:45:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD6C3EC; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:45:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:45:19 +0100 (CET) From: Mohacsi Janos X-X-Sender: mohacsi@strudel.ki.iif.hu To: Ollivier Robert Subject: Re: Recent security announcement and csup/cvsup? In-Reply-To: <20121120100148.GA93826@roberto-aw.eurocontrol.fr> Message-ID: References: <20121117150556.GE24320@in-addr.com> <20121118180421.GF24320@in-addr.com> <20121120100148.GA93826@roberto-aw.eurocontrol.fr> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:45:36 -0000 Dear Ollivier and all, I have problem with the portsnap: I maintain a private "repository" under the /usr/ports: There is a /usr/ports/tmp where I store new ports to be tested, and submitted. The portsnap is removing unrecognized local files. With cvsup I don't have such a problem. I have no information about pkgng, whether I can maintain private repository with pkgng or not? Janos Mohacsi Head of HBONE+ project Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Co-chair of Hungarian IPv6 Forum Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882 On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Gary Palmer on Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 01:04:21PM -0500: >> In other words: while signed updates via freebsd-update and portsnap >> are great for a good chunk of users, they don't address everyones needs. > > Hopefully, with the move toward kngng, there will be less need of portsnap (and /usr/ports for that matter). > > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.net > In memoriam to Ondine, our 2nd child: http://ondine.keltia.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >