Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 May 2012 16:10:27 -0700
From:      Artem Belevich <art@freebsd.org>
To:        Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Cc:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, d@delphij.net, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Allow small amount of memory be mlock()'ed by unprivileged process?
Message-ID:  <CAFqOu6gMLztb7sLd0_yAnSWmSwFo7340mUYSAkWoURaPrS0H8Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgmDW21aPJ5Mp6Tbk1z02ivw4UPhSaNEX%2BWiu7O0v13skA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4FAC3EAB.6050303@delphij.net> <861umkurt8.fsf@ds4.des.no> <CAJ-VmokY%2Bpgcq999NHShbq-3rK3=oeWT2WY7NmTvVdXOHZJhdg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgmDW21aPJ5Mp6Tbk1z02ivw4UPhSaNEX%2BWiu7O0v13skA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote:
> On 16 May 2012 18:32, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> .. what's to stop a fork() bomb from grabbing all pages?
>
> <quote>+ possibly limiting the number of pages per user, =E0 la
> maxprocperuid.</quote>

Shouldn't RLIMIT_NPROC already limit the damage?

--Artem



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFqOu6gMLztb7sLd0_yAnSWmSwFo7340mUYSAkWoURaPrS0H8Q>