From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 20 13:18:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E68916A4CE for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 13:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465D643D4C for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 13:18:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4KKI0s0010968; Thu, 20 May 2004 13:18:00 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id i4KKHxh7010967; Thu, 20 May 2004 13:17:59 -0700 Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 13:17:59 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Jesse Guardiani Message-ID: <20040520201759.GB10119@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <20040520191910.GB28688@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20040520200521.GA7963@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9zSXsLTf0vkW971A" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM portable filesystem abstraction? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 20:18:00 -0000 --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 04:14:40PM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: >=20 > [...] >=20 > > Ideally you'd like a file system that was fast, portable, and > > maintainable. I'm not sure all three are really feasiable unless you're > > really careful about defining portable so the OSes in question have a > > decent set of common VM semantics available with reasionable overhead. > > That's not to say we can't dream or that research shouldn't be done in > > this are, but I think we're definatly in research land here. >=20 > Sure. I'm just surprised that this idea hasn't been researched more to da= te. > The current proliferation of portable storage devices is bound to generate > critical mass for this sort of technology soon (if it hasn't already). >=20 > I'm surprised that device manufacturers haven't sponsored this kind of > research yet. Since for most of them, all the word is a windows box except for a few annoying nuts running MacOS or Linux, FAT seems to be good enough for them. :-( -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFArRJ2XY6L6fI4GtQRAjjGAKDOjTHv2QePjpC7MN2yd1HwdfOzggCeOIlC bKdmUUgNcim7p1WreIZaALA= =4ZIK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A--