From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 2 19:25:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF84BC9C320 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 19:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milstar2@eml.cc) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C7761D4F for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 19:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milstar2@eml.cc) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F2E20B32; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:25:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Jan 2017 14:25:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eml.cc; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=x4UE/eAalaZzGxUY1plEW8XXcK o=; b=h14YbnZQUBIHs2rw50RK0iUpnI7OsouzU5i6m5vsJWWCq/IvHrWH4UxSIU rjwgThpRA8TQ4pvxwpeznX1rinzwuTNkkAufjgiZYBZVb6WqCN62DXE72uTVU+aR Q9MSdldlTCIGcXJf2o+bjOB4HgxD79emVAOM1ZI1gvlrO4BTM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=x4 UE/eAalaZzGxUY1plEW8XXcKo=; b=GbJTUtBO7X4W98XXFtZGLXQhh0tZZxdNGH k/9y7n5aikj20JZGAlOO57IkYRw0KjUL9KaD8uszGvu7OLqPIIzexKiyVCX7R9kH QbPlHSl3FdI7u28+u2pvx/+T6ek8SeXzA9UmsSFlLR6DFzxP4A1mBrb1bdJsMppX KnuTTQ6aA= X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 509D348001; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:25:48 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1483385148.838475.835195569.6E8F7BAE@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: swjatoslaw gerus To: Polytropon Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-9c115fcf Subject: Why don't you just remove one of the Linux installationy you have? -yes ready to perform but Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 20:25:48 +0100 References: <1483234588.3953682.834028153.34EF2FB6@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20170101032236.58b18351.freebsd@edvax.de> <1483319958.407695.834613121.22D7AD34@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20170102022858.aa354bba.freebsd@edvax.de> <1483378580.815169.835118185.09E0A997@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20170102193911.9bfbb0cb.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20170102193911.9bfbb0cb.freebsd@edvax.de> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 19:25:50 -0000 Why don't you just remove one of the Linux installationy you have? yes ready to perform this taskbut in linux grub 1 installation 32 bit 16.04 sda1 2 installation 64 bit 16.04 sda6 was made 1 month later after 1 bsd loader notation another ########################### which of is first ? would try to check bsd loader ########################################## ready to erase 1 installation ######################### but would not possible if erase installation 1 grub would allocate all disk to 2 linux ? or erase 1 -100% sucess would 140 gb free for freebsd -- swjatoslaw gerus milstar2@eml.cc On Mon, Jan 2, 2017, at 07:39 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 18:36:20 +0100, swjatoslaw gerus wrote: > > Tryed .. . system memory not enough > > Please be precise: The _hard disk memory_ probably isn't enough. > You need to either shrink one of the Linux partitions, or remove > one entirely. > > The term "system memory" usually refers to RAM which you have > plenty of, and FreeBSD doesn't need much RAM to work. :-) > > > > > asked about wish to install on Sandisk > > this have 14.3 gb free > > That is possible, but not a good idea, because you want to boot > FreeBSD from the disk (with "disk speed"), not from USB stick, > which has terrible I/O performance. (Not that it's impossible, > but it's a very _very_ bad idea.) > > > > > Would that correct -perform installation on sandisk (usb3 but sony > > usb2) > > No. That would be a bad idea. > > > > > test with usb2 speed 10 mb/sek > > if test sucessfull , erase both linux ad put from sandisk on hda ... > > That would be very much trouble. > > Why don't you just remove one of the Linux installationy you have? > You already said that one doesn't really work at all - so remove > it. Keep the one you're currently working with. Zero risk. > > > > > would that work ? if yes -very good ... limit risk > > As I said, it would work, but the performance and usability will > definitely be bad, and _booting_ that installation would be a > massive problem because the FreeBSD boot media already has one > active partition - the one the installer boots from. > > So to summarize again: > > Shrink or remove one of the Linux installations, then install > into the free and unallocated (!) disk space. > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... -- http://www.fastmail.com - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again