From owner-freebsd-net  Wed Feb  5 22:54:34 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5F437B401
	for <net@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  5 Feb 2003 22:54:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (out1.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net [169.207.3.119])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D07443F93
	for <net@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  5 Feb 2003 22:54:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from [10.1.1.6] (d168.as29.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.73.170])
	by out1.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B8471E7982; Thu,  6 Feb 2003 00:54:30 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:02:56 -0600 (CST)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, "" <net@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Does natd(8) really need to see _all_ packets?
In-Reply-To: <200302041903.03437.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <20030206010219.D33262-100000@patrocles.silby.com>
References: <200302040027.30781@aldan> <200302041142.28554.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
 <1044402261.16309.8.camel@salty.rapid.stbernard.com>
 <200302041903.03437.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Mikhail Teterin wrote:

> = I'm glad you've hit upon a solution that is acceptable. How 'bout
> = writing it up for one of the online magazines? (Hint hint: Daemon
> = News, for instance. ;^) It'll be good practice for writing the BSDCon
> = paper you want to do as well, won't it?
>
> I'd rather improve the rc.firewall example script along the lines of
> the example I posted. That way, noone would need to search Daemon News
> to have an efficiently working NAT... Having to search the web-sites
> smacks of Linux :-)
>
> 	-mi

Er, well, you could always write an article about the process of updating
rc.firewall.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message