From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jul 4 14:08:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA14472 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 Jul 1998 14:08:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA14461; Sat, 4 Jul 1998 14:08:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA28826; Sat, 4 Jul 1998 13:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd028820; Sat Jul 4 20:58:34 1998 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 1998 13:58:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: block device on wst device. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ther is a block interface to wst is this used by anyone? does it work? I think the block interface should go away as it doesn't really make much sense on tapes. (same for wt.c) In effect it went a way some time ago for st.c To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message