From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 9 12:33:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA23324 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 12:33:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from andrsn.stanford.edu (andrsn.Stanford.EDU [36.33.0.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA23317 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 12:33:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu) Received: from localhost (localhost.stanford.edu [127.0.0.1]) by andrsn.stanford.edu (8.8.7/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA25878; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 12:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 12:31:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Annelise Anderson To: Julian Elischer cc: Greg Lehey , Robert Rusk , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux vs freeBSD In-Reply-To: <343D27A8.167EB0E7@whistle.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, Julian Elischer wrote: > Annelise Anderson wrote: > > > > > > Is the FreeBSD network code still better than Linux? > > not really. The NFS code still lags. > they re-wrote their networking top work along similar lines toours > (except with a more modern approach) it works well. > I think maybe what I meant was the TCP/IP stuff....which at one time was supposed to be better....is the answer to that different? AA