From owner-cvs-all Thu Jul 13 0:46:20 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B38437B5E4; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:46:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from knu@idaemons.org) Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (203-165-77-17.sugnm1.kt.home.ne.jp [203.165.77.17]) by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W 04/27/00) with ESMTP id QAA26118; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:46:10 +0900 (JST) Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id QAA27715; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:45:39 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:45:37 +0900 Message-ID: <86ya36zd5q.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: green@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/vmware2/files md5 ports/emulators/vmware2/scripts configure In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:51:43 -0400 (EDT)" References: <200007130643.XAA80711@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/1.1.2 (Raspberry Beret) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 9) (Canyonlands) (i386--freebsd) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1BEF D9B2 BABD 25D7 659A FD08 89C2 F3BE E981 4E16 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.12 - "Euglena sociabilis") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:51:43 -0400 (EDT), Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > > > Update md5 due to their repack of the distfile as of a week ago. > > - vmware-sniffer and vmware-wizard were changed. (details unknown) > > - vmmon/vmnet/vmppuser sources were unchanged, however, some of the > > binaries (for Linux) seems have recompiled. That would not affect > > us because we compile them from source. > > It seems possibly suspect to me... I didn't update my vmware yet because > I have no clue what the changes in the binaries are. I'm wary enough that > I'm at least not going to run this revision of vmware until I see a company > statement. It's your choice. In fact, neither did I.. :) I might say it is _not_ mandatory for most of you to update, because the vendor did not update the main binary of VMware nor the core modules, that could be considered as the main reson why they did not bump the build number. In any case, it goes without saying that repacking a distfile without renaming it is something to strongly blame. :-/ -- / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org "We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message