From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 11 15:27:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA26578 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 15:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ren.mill.net (root@ren.millennianet.com [206.71.161.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA26568 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 15:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dt3h1nd2 (dt3h1nd2.san.rr.com [204.210.19.210]) by ren.mill.net (8.8.6/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA11275 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 15:27:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.19970911152651.00c1daf0@marshotel.coapt.com> X-Sender: matt@marshotel.coapt.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.2 (32) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 15:26:51 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Matt Wilbur Subject: NATD and Quake Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I've been using IPDIVERT and natd on 2.2R/3.0-SNAP* for quite some time now, with NO major snags, save its inability to proxy quake :( (this is for my home boxes, so yeah, quake is a need ;-) I've heard wind that lin[s]ux's ip_masquerading now has a quake kernel module, has anyone heard wind of something similar for natd? I've tried setting permanent_link(s) for the applicable ports (26000, others depending on the server), but it seems to dynamically assign a new port... Unfortunately, I don't have the time, or clues required to do something like this from scratch, but I don't want to have to move my gateway box to linux either, unless absolutely necessary.... Ideas? Regards, Matt /////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Matt Wilbur Support the Anti-Spam amendment Photon Research Associates Join at http://www.cauce.org/