From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 14 00:22:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0C7DF16A4CE; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:22:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ns.obluda.cz (ns.obluda.cz [195.250.140.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8ACDD43D54; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:22:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dan@obluda.cz)
Received: from ns.obluda.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ns.obluda.cz (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8E0LwMh085110;
	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:21:58 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from dan@obluda.cz)
Received: from localhost (dan@localhost)
	by ns.obluda.cz (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id i8E0LvRs085107;
	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:21:58 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from dan@obluda.cz)
X-Authentication-Warning: ns.obluda.cz: dan owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:21:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dan Lukes <dan@obluda.cz>
To: Dima Dorfman <dd@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200409130834.i8D8Y2ls032527@freefall.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040914021142.F84331@ns.obluda.cz>
References: <200409130834.i8D8Y2ls032527@freefall.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/71662: [PATCH] cleanup of the usr.sbin/ifmcast code
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:22:02 -0000

> Since WARNS means that warnings
> will break the build, though, it's good to be able to test the change
> on more than one architecture to make sure you don't miss any
> platform-specific issues.

 	Unfortunatelly, I have no easy access to a non-PC architecture
computer, so I can't perform this kind of test ...

 					Dan