Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:41:40 GMT From: Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 186853 for review Message-ID: <201012111241.oBBCfe5u091972@skunkworks.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://p4web.freebsd.org/@@186853?ac=10 Change 186853 by trasz@trasz_victim on 2010/12/11 12:41:32 Update TODO. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/soc2009/trasz_limits/TODO#34 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/soc2009/trasz_limits/TODO#34 (text+ko) ==== @@ -25,14 +25,25 @@ Milestone 3: + - Fix %CPU limits for shortly living processes. + + - Make sure we enforce limits whenever it's needed. + + - Add support for hierarchical jails. + + - Get rid of container_lock. Atomic instructions would be nice, but we really + need 64 bits (per-process counters could be 32 bit, I guess, but the higher + level containers could overflow), and atomic(9) doesn't support 64 bit values + on 32 bit platforms. + + - Rethink HRL locking. + - Consider replacing proc pointer with thread pointer in rusage_add(9) et al. In most cases caller uses 'td->td_proc' anyway, and passing thread would allow the HRL code to send a signal to the offending thread instead of the offending process. - - Add support for hierarchical jails. - - - Make sure we enforce limits whenever it's needed. + - Add a tool a'la zonestat(1M). Issues:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201012111241.oBBCfe5u091972>