Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:41:40 GMT
From:      Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   PERFORCE change 186853 for review
Message-ID:  <201012111241.oBBCfe5u091972@skunkworks.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://p4web.freebsd.org/@@186853?ac=10

Change 186853 by trasz@trasz_victim on 2010/12/11 12:41:32

	Update TODO.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/soc2009/trasz_limits/TODO#34 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/soc2009/trasz_limits/TODO#34 (text+ko) ====

@@ -25,14 +25,25 @@
 
 Milestone 3:
 
+ - Fix %CPU limits for shortly living processes.
+
+ - Make sure we enforce limits whenever it's needed.
+
+ - Add support for hierarchical jails.
+
+ - Get rid of container_lock.  Atomic instructions would be nice, but we really
+   need 64 bits (per-process counters could be 32 bit, I guess, but the higher
+   level containers could overflow), and atomic(9) doesn't support 64 bit values
+   on 32 bit platforms.
+
+ - Rethink HRL locking.
+
  - Consider replacing proc pointer with thread pointer in rusage_add(9) et al.
    In most cases caller uses 'td->td_proc' anyway, and passing thread would
    allow the HRL code to send a signal to the offending thread instead of the
    offending process.
 
- - Add support for hierarchical jails.
-
- - Make sure we enforce limits whenever it's needed.
+ - Add a tool a'la zonestat(1M).
 
 Issues:
 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201012111241.oBBCfe5u091972>