From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jul 31  6:42:19 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072D437B6FA
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
	by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1)
	id 13JFp4-000HrQ-00; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 15:41:38 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Anton Berezin <tobez@plab.ku.dk>
Cc: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: perl vs. LOCALBASE, again 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 31 Jul 2000 15:23:50 +0200."
             <20000731152350.U48988@plab.ku.dk> 
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 15:41:38 +0200
Message-ID: <68659.965050898@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


When discussing things like this, where the problem area has a known
maintainer, I think that it's wise to include that maintainer in the
discussion.

Yes, FreeBSD developers are expected to read their -current mail, but in
reality, the high level of noise on this list tends to make people very
quick with their mailer's deletion facility.

In this case, you should chat to Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org>.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message