From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 7 11: 1:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AD737B422 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:00:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020307190012.LHEK2951.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 19:00:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA43213; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:43:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:43:01 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Zhihui Zhang Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A question of VM page ownership In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG which one does the data come from? On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Zhihui Zhang wrote: > > Is there any fundamental reason why a page can not be owned by more than > one VM object? If that was the case, the bogus page stuff in vfs_bio.c > could be made cleaner IMHO. > > -Zhihui > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message